<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mommy, Are We Socialists Yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.metroi4news.com/2009/02/mommy-are-we-socialists-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.metroi4news.com/2009/02/mommy-are-we-socialists-yet/</link>
	<description>Highlighting the News from Florida&#039;s Central Corridor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:47:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.metroi4news.com/2009/02/mommy-are-we-socialists-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metroi4news.com/?p=2695#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Conservatism rocks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatism rocks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.metroi4news.com/2009/02/mommy-are-we-socialists-yet/comment-page-1/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.metroi4news.com/?p=2695#comment-315</guid>
		<description>On the one hand I sincerely appreciate MI4&#039;s effort to bring in a variety of voices. 

On the other hand, where to begin? You&#039;re not really making a serious argument. You&#039;ve mischaracterized, made unsupportable assertions, confused some simple definitions, and your argument is not cogent.

This is really just a gussied-up way of saying &quot;Democrats are doo-doo heads!&quot;

I just wrote out 10 questions about yr post, but decided that might be too overwhelming. Let&#039;s just try to define some broad terms. How are you defining socialism? Generally socialism is understood as being the state ownership of the means of production, but that doesn&#039;t seem to be the way you&#039;re using it. 

And, if you&#039;re really interested in making a strong argument, you need to sincerely make the strongest argument you can FOR a stimulus bill and then, using cogency and evidence, explain why that argument will not stand.

Otherwise I can only respond - Oh, yeah? Well, I think Republicans are doo-doo heads!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the one hand I sincerely appreciate MI4&#8242;s effort to bring in a variety of voices. </p>
<p>On the other hand, where to begin? You&#8217;re not really making a serious argument. You&#8217;ve mischaracterized, made unsupportable assertions, confused some simple definitions, and your argument is not cogent.</p>
<p>This is really just a gussied-up way of saying &#8220;Democrats are doo-doo heads!&#8221;</p>
<p>I just wrote out 10 questions about yr post, but decided that might be too overwhelming. Let&#8217;s just try to define some broad terms. How are you defining socialism? Generally socialism is understood as being the state ownership of the means of production, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to be the way you&#8217;re using it. </p>
<p>And, if you&#8217;re really interested in making a strong argument, you need to sincerely make the strongest argument you can FOR a stimulus bill and then, using cogency and evidence, explain why that argument will not stand.</p>
<p>Otherwise I can only respond &#8211; Oh, yeah? Well, I think Republicans are doo-doo heads!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

